Mazda CX-9 Vs. Toyota Highlander: Size, Specs, & Features
Motorists shopping for a new or late-model midsize three-row crossover SUV will likely consider comparing the Mazda CX-9 vs. Toyota Highlander. After all, both of these midsize SUVs include standard three-row seating for seven, expansive cargo capacity, and advanced technology at a competitive price.
But which family-focused model would you choose in this CX-9 vs. Highlander debate? Check out our detailed comparison review below to learn how these three-row midsize SUVs stack up in key areas like size, specs, safety, and more.
We’re comparing the 2023 models of both three-row crossover SUVs since 2023 was the final year of the CX-9 before being replaced by the Mazda CX-90, the automaker’s next-generation three-row SUV.
Continue with our Mazda CX-9 vs. Toyota Highlander head-to-head comparison before taking a closer look at these crossover SUVs in person with a tour and test drive or two.
CX-9 Vs. Highlander: Size & Dimensions
Both the Mazda CX-9 and Toyota Highlander are classified as midsize SUVs and feature standard three-row seating, and they’re quite similarly sized, too. The CX-9 measures 199.4 inches long, 77.5 inches wide, and 67.6 inches tall, and rides on a 115.3-inch wheelbase. At 194.9 inches long on a 112.2-inch wheelbase, 76 inches wide, and 68.1 inches tall, the Highlander is only a bit smaller than the CX-9.
While the CX-9 is bigger than the Highlander on the exterior by a slim margin, inside, the comparison gets even closer in many regards. The Toyota SUV is well-packaged, with 144.5 cubic feet of total passenger volume, which compares favorably to the Mazda model’s 135.8 cubic feet.
The story is similar when it comes to cargo capacity: the Highlander tops the CX-9 in both standard cargo space with all seats upright and maximum cargo volume with the second and third rows folded. The 16 cubic feet of space behind the Highlander’s third row isn’t much more substantial than the CX-9 and its 14.4 cubic feet, but it’s something to consider.
If you’re shopping for a three-row SUV instead of a two-row model, chances are you plan to use that third row to seat additional occupants regularly. So, which of these midsize SUV models comes out on top in the critical third-row space and comfort comparison? Let’s have a look.
The Mazda CX-9 and Toyota Highlander both have reputations for slightly cramped third rows, but it seems that reputation has hurt the CX-9 more than it has hampered the Highlander. But in fact, the Mazda CX-9 third-row seating is more spacious and comfortable than the Highlander’s, thanks largely to the Mazda model’s greater third-row leg room.
With 29.7 inches of third-row leg room in the Mazda CX-9 compared to just 28 inches in the Highlander, the CX-9 interior is significantly more spacious for back-row riders.
CX-9 Vs. Highlander: Features & Characteristics
SUV shoppers will quickly discover that the Mazda CX-9 offers premium amenities as standard equipment. Still, the Highlander requires costly upgrades to pricier trims to match the Mazda SUV’s features list. For example, only the Mazda CX-9 gets a standard leather-wrapped steering wheel, adjustable driver lumbar support, and heated front seats. You’ll have to choose a higher Highlander trim level to find similar amenities.
Like other new and late-model Mazda cars and SUVs, the CX-9 prioritizes driving dynamics, control, and safety instead of simply the latest gizmos and gadgets.
Instead of a touch-screen display, the Mazda Connect infotainment screen is operated via a rotary commander knob and buttons between the front seats, enabling the driver to control vehicle settings without reaching forward for a screen to manipulate.
The Highlander uses a traditional touch screen.
Other Mazda CX-9 features and technologies not found on the Toyota Highlander include:
- Nappa leather-trimmed seats
- Red leather interior
- Polymetal Gray Metallic paint
- Larger 2.5-liter turbocharged engine
- Standard all-wheel drive (AWD)
- Smart City Brake Support-Reverse
Start comparing the Mazda CX-9 trim levels, exterior and interior design, and standard and available amenities to the Toyota Highlander. It should become clear which model looks and feels more premium and prioritizes driver engagement and passenger comfort.
Highlander Vs. CX-9 Specs: Engine & Performance
The 2023 Mazda CX-9 and 2023 Toyota Highlander each offer just one gas-powered engine, making comparing these crossover SUV models pretty straightforward. These similarly sized sport-utes provide similar power output. In fact, the Mazda CX-9’s Skyactiv-G 2.5-liter turbo engine generates 310 pound-feet of torque, the same torque figure as the Highlander’s 2.4-liter turbo-four, also rated at 310 pound-feet.
However, only one of these three-row crossover SUVs comes standard with the enhanced traction, performance, and safety of AWD, and that’s the Mazda CX-9.
The Toyota Highlander features standard front-wheel drive (FWD), but AWD is an available option. Still, why pay extra for something that’s standard on the Mazda CX-9? Plus, the CX-9 gets Mazda’s i-Activ AWD as standard equipment, which isn’t just any old AWD system: it proactively determines where to send torque, detecting and reacting to wheel slip before a human driver will even feel any loss of traction underfoot.
Toyota Highlander Vs. Mazda CX-9: Safety & Reliability
The Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-9 both perform particularly well regarding reliability and safety. Both midsize SUV models come standard-equipped with a comprehensive suite of advanced safety technologies and driver-assist systems that promote on-road peace of mind.
For instance, the 2023 Mazda CX-9 is offered with the i-Activsense package, a suite of safety technologies including:
- Advanced Smart City Brake Support with Day and Night-time Pedestrian Detection
- Blind Spot Monitoring
- Smart Braking Systems
- Mazda Radar Cruise Control with Stop & Go
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Adaptive Front-Lighting System
- Lane Departure Warning System
- Lane-Keep Assist
- Traffic Sign Recognition
- Driver Attention Alert
- High Beam Control
The Highlander is available with several similar systems as part of the Toyota Safety Sense suite.
Regarding reliability, both crossover SUVs are motivated by proven and reliable powertrains built to last. The automakers that manufacture these three-row SUVs are each well-respected for constructing dependable, long-lasting vehicles offering a low cost of ownership. So, you can’t go wrong with either choice on the safety and reliability fronts.
Mazda CX-9 Vs. Toyota Highlander: Final Thoughts
Once you consider all factors, we think you’ll come to our conclusion. The Mazda CX-9 is the way to go for drivers seeking a sporty and engaging three-row crossover SUV that’s perfect for a growing family but drives smaller than it is. Toyota’s Highlander offers several benefits over its competitor, the CX-9, but those perks come with compromises, like a more cramped third row and a dull driving experience.
We’ll be bringing you more model comparisons of Mazda models, new and old, so stay tuned to the MazdaMotoring blog and consider subscribing to our newsletter for occasional updates if you haven’t already.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Never miss a Mazda when you sign up for our email list:
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, the Mazda CX-9 or Toyota Highlander?
The Mazda CX-9 is bigger than the Toyota Highlander. The Mazda three-row crossover SUV model measures 199.4 inches long, 67.6 inches tall, and 77.5 inches wide. The Highlander is only slightly smaller on its exterior at 194.9 inches long, 68.1 inches tall, and 76 inches wide. Back-row passengers will appreciate the CX-9’s greater third-row leg room compared to the cramped Highlander.
What is the difference between a Toyota Highlander and Mazda CX-9?
The 2023 Mazda CX-9 is powered by a Skyactiv-G 2.5-liter turbocharged engine paired with a standard i-Activ AWD system for surefooted all-road performance. The 2023 Toyota Highlander comes standard with FWD and a 2.4-liter turbo engine, but AWD is available for an upcharge. There’s more cargo space in the Highlander but greater third-row leg room in the CX-9.